Practice·August 9, 2026 · 3 min read

Filtered. Not discarded.

FDA Radar ingests every device recall and every 510(k) clearance. It pushes almost none of them to a human — the boundary between the corpus and the review queue is a single classification field, not a judgment call.

By Connor Griggs — Regulatory & Quality Strategist

Open FDA Radar’s review queue on an ordinary week and it holds a handful of items — a Class I recall, a warning letter, a guidance notice. Query the underlying corpus the same week and it holds hundreds. Both numbers are correct. They are not measuring the same thing.

One field decides the boundary

Every item FDA Radar ingests gets a review state of either pending (it reaches a human) or filtered (it does not, though it stays searchable and feeds the corpus a watchlist queries later). For most sources the answer is always pending — a warning letter or a Federal Register notice is rare enough that every one earns review. Device recalls are the exception, and the rule there is narrow: a recall queues only if openFDA’s own classification field reads Class I. Class II, Class III, and recalls FDA has not yet classified at all stay in the corpus, filtered.

The volume that forced the rule

The classes are not a stylistic choice. Under FDA’s own definition, a Class I recall is one where there is a reasonable probability that use of, or exposure to, the product will cause serious adverse health consequences or death; Class II covers temporary or medically reversible harm, or a remote probability of anything worse; Class III covers harm that is not likely at all. The three labels sit on the same enforcement record, and nothing about the record separates a single Class I event from the ordinary Class II volume around it — a team has to read the field.

A 30-day measurement taken during development put a number on that volume: 327 items across every source, and recalls alone accounted for 300 of them — 250 Class II, 50 Class I. Add in the roughly 250 510(k) clearances FDA publishes in an average month, almost all irrelevant to any one company, and an unfiltered queue approaches 500 items a month against a review model costed for about 18 a week. A queue built to be read cannot also be a queue that repeats everything FDA published; something has to be corpus instead of alert, and class is the field that tells the two apart.

Filtered is not a euphemism for discarded. A Class II recall a reviewer never saw is still in the database, still tied to its product code, still there the day a watchlist or a search asks for it — it was simply never pushed at anyone.

The practice

Reading FDA Radar’s digest as a complete recall feed is the mistake the classification field exists to prevent. The digest is a triage decision, not a transcript: it surfaces what FDA itself reserves for a reasonable probability of serious injury or death, on the assumption that a Class II correction to a labeling issue does not need the same day’s attention that a Class I recall on a device cited as predicate does. Whether a specific Class II event still deserves a closer look is a judgment for whoever owns that product code — that reading, like every reading in Signals, is regulatory intelligence and method, never regulatory advice about a recall of your own. The corpus is built for exactly that judgment: search it, or let a watchlist ask it the narrower question the daily queue was never meant to answer.

FDA Radar states the boundary on the page that lists what we monitor and how often rather than leaving it to be discovered from a recall that never arrived. It is the same principle editorial standards states directly: being comprehensive is FDA’s job, and being clear about what does not reach a human is ours.

Regulatory intelligence, not regulatory advice. This post describes method and published FDA records as of its date; decisions about a specific device belong with your regulatory professional.

Method
The guidance isn't in the Federal Register.
Method
There are two recall databases, not one
Practice
Breakthrough status is confidential by law
Practice
One MAUDE report is not one malfunction
Method
A supplement number is not a track
Method
Cleared is not approved
Practice
Nationwide doesn't mean your building
Practice
Not every correction reaches FDA
Method
Registered. Not reviewed.
Method
Contact ODE is not a pathway
Practice
Almost no recall is FDA-mandated
Method
FDA's device names read like a card catalog
Practice
openFDA is free. It is not unlimited.
Method
GUDID stores the model. Not the box.
Practice
Detention doesn't need a warning letter
Method
A Class I device, a Class I recall
Practice
21 CFR 820 didn't move. Its contents did.
Method
The product code that doesn't exist yet
Practice
The classification posts. The 483 behind it doesn't.
Method
A recall has three dates, and the pipeline had to pick one
Practice
The count is real. The rate is not.
Method
The firm on the record is not the firm on the box
Practice
Low confidence is an instruction, not a hedge
Method
The same company, spelled three ways
Practice
A device that was never a medical device
Method
FDA's warning letters, addressed by column number
Practice
Your regulation has a decimal. FDA's watch doesn't.
Method
Three letters is too short to search for
Practice
Most warning letters never close
Method
The guidance that skipped the draft
Practice
Ongoing, as of when?
Method
The least interesting fact in a 510(k)
Practice
No recall arrives with a product code attached
Practice
The deadline that doesn't email you
Method
The warning letter has two dates
Method
How to monitor FDA without drowning
Practice
Your predicate was recalled. Now what?
Method
Why no item reaches you without a human